Classifieds | Archives | Jobs | About TGT | Contact | Subscribe
Last updated 1 hour, 34 minutes ago
Printer Friendly Version | TGT@Twitter | RSS Feed |
Uber loses employment rights case in Britain
November 11, 2017
 Print    Send to Friend

London: US ride-hailing app Uber on Friday lost a landmark case in Britain that would give drivers the right to paid holidays and the national minimum wage, lawyers representing the claimants said.

The London employment tribunal rejected Uber’s appeal against an October 2016 ruling in a case that is being closely watched for the wider implications for Britain’s booming “gig economy.”

“Our clients have fought tirelessly to gain the rights that they clearly should have been afforded from the outset,” Paul Jennings from law firm Bates Wells Braithwaite said in a statement.

“The ruling will have significant implications for approximately 40,000 Uber drivers and, more broadly, individuals engaged across the so-called gig economy,” he said.

Uber said it will appeal the ruling.

“The main reason why drivers use Uber is because they value the freedom to choose if, when and where they drive and so we intend to appeal,” Tom Elvidge, Uber UK’s acting general manager, said in a statement.

“Over the last year we have made a number of changes to our app to give drivers even more control. We’ve also invested in things like access to illness and injury cover,” he said.

Uber drivers are paid for each ride and the firm insists they are self-employed, choosing when, where and for how long they drive.

However, James Farrar, who brought the test case with fellow former driver Yaseen Aslam, has called Uber’s business plan “brutally exploitative.”

They are supported by the Independent Workers of Great Britain (IWGB) trade union, which also represents couriers, cleaners, foster carers and security officers.

“These companies are making a mockery of supposed employment rights,” the union’s general secretary Jason Moyer-Lee said in a statement.

Ahead of the ruling, an Uber spokesman told AFP that whatever the result, it “will not necessarily be the end of the process and we expect either side would appeal.”

Any challenge would go to the Court of Appeal and finally the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court is already preparing to consider a similar case involving the company Pimlico Plumbers, which is appealing a ruling that one of its former plumbers was entitled to employment rights. Uber, meanwhile, is currently fighting a decision by London authorities not to renew its licence, owing to public safety concerns.

Agence France-Presse

Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Post a comment
Related Stories
Uber goes to court to defend its business model
LONDON: Uber heads to a British court on Tuesday to defend its business model of treating drivers as self-employed, entitling them to few rights in law, in the latest sta..
Uber plans pollution levy on London fares
LONDON: Uber will levy a “clean air fee” on London journeys from early 2019 to help tackle pollution and part-fund electric cars for its drivers, the pioneer ride-sharing..
Uber wins London licence but with conditions
LONDON: Uber avoided a ban in London on Tuesday after the taxi-hailing app’s new management made changes to ease strained relations with the city’s transport regulator, b..
Uber says will introduce new safety features
LONDON: Taxi service Uber, battling to retain its licence to operate in the British capital, said on Friday it would introduce new safety features, including 24-hour tele..
Uber heads to court in fight for survival
LONDON: Uber will defend its right to operate in London in a court hearing on Monday after the app was deemed unfit to run a taxi service and stripped of its licence in i..
Advertise | Copyright