Classifieds | Archives | Jobs | About TGT | Contact | Subscribe
Last updated 5 Days, 7 hours, 22 minutes ago
Printer Friendly Version | TGT@Twitter | RSS Feed |
Lawmakers seek more answers on Benghazi attack
November 18, 2012
 Print    Send to Friend

WASHINGTON: Former CIA chief David Petraeus has done little to halt bi-partisan sparring over whether the administration misled the public over who was behind an attack on the US consulate in Benghazi, Libya.

Petraeus appeared on Friday before two congressional committees in his first public appearance since resigning last week over an extramarital affair with his biographer Paula Broadwell.

Petraeus told House and Senate lawmakers that he knew from the outset that the attack, which killed four Americans including US ambassador Chris Stevens, was the work of terrorists.

However, Petraeus said the administration withheld this information so as not to let the attackers know that American intelligence agencies were tracking them, The New York Times and other news outlets said, quoting lawmakers.

In the days after the attack, which came right in the middle of the US presidential election campaign, the administration said the hours-long assault erupted as part of a simultaneous protest over an anti-Muslim video.

On Sept.14, Petraeus apparently told Congress that that was the CIA’s initial take on the events.

Since then, the administration’s position has evolved, and the attack is now seen as having been a pre-meditated assault by an Al Qaeda-linked militia.

Peter King, chairman of the House Homeland Security committee, said Petraeus has changed his take on the attack since September.

“General Petraeus’s testimony today was from the start he had told us this was a terrorist attack or terrorist-involved,” King said.

“I told him in my questions I had a different recollection of that and the clear impression given was that the overwhelming matter of evidence is that it... arose out of a spontaneous demonstration and was not a terrorist attack.” King and other lawmakers said they were grateful for Petraeus’s testimony but they made it clear they still had deep concerns.

“Many of my questions were answered. Many were not,” said Howard “Buck” McKeon, chairman of the House Armed Services Committee who sat in on a Benghazi briefing on Friday by Director of National Intelligence James Clapper.

“We’re past the election,” the Republican added. “I think it’s time now for them to lay it all out.”

Agence France-Presse

Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Post a comment
Related Stories
Clinton gets official review of Benghazi attack
WASHINGTON: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on Monday received an official review of the September attack on a US diplomatic mission in Benghazi in Libya, setting the ..
Advertise | Copyright