Classifieds | Archives | Jobs | About TGT | Contact | Subscribe
 | 
Last updated 3 minutes ago
Printer Friendly Version | TGT@Twitter | RSS Feed |
HOME LOCAL MIDEAST ASIA WORLD BUSINESS SPORT OPINION WRITERS
Fred Cohan and Isaac Klimasmith: As temperatures rise, infectious diseases spread
December 07, 2018
 Print    Send to Friend

Nearly 50 years ago, in the summer of 1969, Time magazine published photos of Cleveland’s Cuyahoga River in flames, searing the images into the national consciousness.

The Cuyahoga River on fire became a lasting symbol of environmental damage and pollution — and a tipping point that helped galvanise Americans to take action and Congress to enact landmark environmental legislation, including the Clean Water Act and Clean Air Act. Together, these laws save hundreds of thousands of American lives every year.

The recent National Climate Assessment paints a clear picture of the much larger environmental crisis that the United States confronts today: global warming. According to the report by 13 federal agencies, global warming will harm our ecosystems and our economy.

Yet we continue to meet the rising temperatures, superstorms, drought and mega-fires brought about by climate change with relative inaction. Although the environmental costs of global warming may still seem distant to some Americans, there is a growing threat that many may find harder to ignore: infectious disease.

As another new report, the Lancet Countdown on Health and Climate Change, makes clear, warming poses a diversity of risks for human health. More and more, hot summers will increase mortality and limit our capacity for outdoor labour. Superstorms in some regions will cause flooding of sewage systems and thereby spread gastrointestinal disease, while severe droughts in other regions will increase rates of asthma. Food production will be severely reduced in many countries. Many regions will see increased risks of infection.

Although environmental destruction may not scare us in an immediate way, infectious diseases very well could. Indeed, the impacts on human health could become the burning river of the 21st century.

Let’s begin with Lyme disease. Forest destruction in the Northeast creates small wooded habitats where mammals that consume a variety of food can thrive while the diversity of other more specialised species plummets.

The white-footed mouse is one such generalist that abounds in tiny forests. Unfortunately, this mouse is poor at removing ticks but excellent at infecting them with Lyme disease. Meanwhile, small forests are missing the Virginia opossum, the so-called vacuum cleaner of the forest, which is able to remove and kill almost all the ticks it picks up.

Destroying a forest can also spark a pandemic. In West Africa, deforestation displaced bats from their forest habitat into villages such as Meliandou in southern Guinea. There, in 2013, a 2-year-old boy encountered a colony of bats in a hollow tree and contracted Ebola, a disease that would go on to claim his life and the lives of more than 11,000 other people.

As the world warms, tropical diseases are inching their way toward the United States. One such disease, leishmaniasis, marks its victims with crusty skin lesions and disfiguring scars. It has already spread north from Mexico, through southern Texas and into Oklahoma.

Other tropical diseases that are being unleashed along with a warmer climate include elephantiasis, which causes a grotesque swelling of the limbs; Chagas disease, which can lead to severe chronic heart problems; and the Zika virus, with its attendant fetal brain disorders. All of these diseases are likely to move north.

Infectious diseases will make visceral the toll that environmental destruction takes on human health, and in doing so may become a powerful motivator. In the past, humans have harnessed our fears of infection to improve public health — seeking cures, creating safe water supplies and discovering vaccines.

As a result of climate change, we will need to expand our concept of public health to include the broader environment. To protect the health of our own bodies, humans must also care for the natural world around us.

The fires on the Cuyahoga River were a watershed moment for environmental awareness in the United States. The leishmaniasis-scarred faces of Americans in the heartland may be next.

Tribune News Service

Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Comments
 
Post a comment
 
Name:
Country:
City:
Email:
Comment:
 
    
    
Related Stories
Nick Bridge: An enduring threat
“It is existential.” It was all the Fijian Prime Minister needed to say, when I asked him about climate change, after the most powerful cyclone ever recorded in the Sout..
Mary Creagh: Action, not consultation, needed on plastic waste
A year ago, the chancellor stood at the despatch box, waxed lyrical about the BBC’s Blue Planet II series and promised to make the UK “a world-leader in tackling the scou..
Eugene Linden: A Nobel for aiding climate denial and delay
It has been a scary month in climate science. Hurricane Michael and a frightening report from the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change underlined the potential co..
Amit Kapoor: When politics plays truant
In a curious happenstance last week, two global events put the spotlight on the critical issue of climate change. First, the United Nations’ scientific panel on climat..
Bill McKibben: Climate civil disobedience proves a point
The small town of Bagley, Minnesota, looked set to be the scene for one of the nation’s most interesting airings of the climate controversy this week. Three people went o..
FRONTPAGE
 
GALLERY
 
PANORAMA
 
TIME OUT
 
SPORT
 
 
Advertise | Copyright