Classifieds | Archives | Jobs | About TGT | Contact | Subscribe
 | 
Last updated 17 minutes ago
Printer Friendly Version | TGT@Twitter | RSS Feed |
HOME LOCAL MIDEAST ASIA WORLD BUSINESS SPORT OPINION WRITERS
Dejan Jotanovic: Is artificial intelligence undoing women’s rights?
June 21, 2018
 Print    Send to Friend

Before Siri and Cortana, pop culture offered up several versions of feminised artificial intelligence – but none of the artists perhaps envisioned how the reality could take us backwards rather than propel us into a new, more equal world.

Charli XCX’s latest album, Pop 2, has been dubbed as the “sequel” to pop music. The 10-track mixtape is riddled with a slew of pop sirens, underground up-and-comers and club-ready anthems: “Go f*** your prototype I’m an upgrade of your stereotype,” Charli sings in Femmebot.

In 2010, Robyn’s Fembot interrogated the intersection of womanhood and androidism, while Christina Aguilera’s sixth album that same year, Bionic, toyed between electro-pop beats (the machine) and stripped-back ballads (the woman).

The phenomenon has long been computed into film and pop culture (Her (2013), Ex Machina (2014), Stepford Wives (1975), Metropolis (1927)), but only recently have physical manifestations entered our reality.

Just as we acknowledge the wiring of femmebots and female pop stars, we should also consider the broader parallel between women and technology, and the increased feminisation of artificial intelligence.

Think to the artificial intelligence we hold in our hands or that lie at our bedside: Siri, Google, Cortana, Alexa. While Siri is default male in the United Kingdom (it’s thought that Brits respond better to “authoritative” voices), it’s typically understood that consumers are looking for a voice of obedience and subservience, a voice trained take direction, to always be available, always of service. A woman’s voice: the perfect servant.

Historically this fits neatly into a patriarchal tradition where women are both forcibly and insidiously assigned roles that speak solely to servitude. “Siri, play some music” is reminiscent of the traditional 1950s housewife; women locked into domestic labour and the chores of the household. “Hey Google, when is my meeting today?” brings forward the Mad Men-era secretary, carefully schooled to listen and respond but never speak against. Women today are still over-represented in service-facing jobs (nurse, teacher, flight attendant, waitress), because the language of sexism maintains that this is the natural order.

The feminisation of artificial intelligence therefore isn’t just an illustration of women’s continued subservience in current society, but is also used as a vehicle to naturalise sexism even further. The more we condition ourselves to speak to our AI with the dichotomy of master and servant, the further we banish femininity and womanhood to old-fashioned stereotypes about how women and men are meant to be. Worse, we begin to unpick the seams of what feminism and the women’s movement has long fought for: agency, women’s liberation and the idea that men and women have equal capabilities.

Instead of designing technology that can move us towards gender equality, it seems that major tech industries are simply regurgitating and reproducing the status quo: designing for the world that already is, rather than the world that ought to be. It seems almost comical in its dullness that when faced with the opportunity to design a post-human world, cutting-edge tech still caters to traditional gender roles. But is this all too surprising when considering the makeup of the tech industry? Across all the powerhouse companies (Google, Apple, Amazon, Intel, Microsoft) white men lead the pack in both average employment and leadership.

In seeing the blueprints of our society’s future (Google plans to build cities!) it looks as if Charli’s anthemic vision – the upgrade of our stereotypes – is destined to short-circuit. Just as tech’s power to influence and shape our future and its values continues to grow, so does the urgency for inclusivity and diversity. Because this upgrade can only be completed once women are invited to become the architects of these societal values – and importantly – their own voices.

The Independent

Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Comments
 
Post a comment
 
Name:
Country:
City:
Email:
Comment:
 
    
    
Related Stories
Delyth Jewell: Sickening abuse of women politicians needs to be probed
The abuse of women MPs on the streets of Westminster and online isn’t just about Brexit, or any other area where people have strong views. My research has shown it is jus..
Akanksha Singh: Faith and gender equality faces litmus test
While some of us were bringing in the New Year with heavy heads, thousands of women in the southern Indian state of Kerala joined hands to form a 620km-long “women’s wall..
Biba Kang: Millane’s death should be a wake-up call for
No woman could hear about the death of Grace Millane without feeling a wrench of empathy, a wave of panic and a jolt of fear. Grace was a recent graduate travelling aroun..
Rosie Millard: What it takes to be a successful woman leader
Slow handclaps all round. Having been “ordered” by the government two years ago to appoint women in at least a third of their boardroom positions, a recent review of the ..
Biba Kang: Focus on crime, not misogyny
Chief constable Sara Thornton, one of the UK’s most senior police officers, has said that she does not want to see misogyny and misandry classed as hate crimes because fo..
FRONTPAGE
 
GALLERY
 
PANORAMA
 
TIME OUT
 
SPORT
 
 
Advertise | Copyright