Classifieds | Archives | Jobs | About TGT | Contact | Subscribe
 | 
Last updated 3 minutes ago
Printer Friendly Version | TGT@Twitter | RSS Feed |
HOME LOCAL MIDEAST ASIA WORLD BUSINESS SPORT OPINION WRITERS
Kenneth Roth: Putin must stop killing Syrians before seeking aid
August 29, 2018
 Print    Send to Friend

Wielding a carrot and a stick, Russian president Vladimir Putin is seeking reconstruction aid for Syria.

The carrot is Putin’s claim that large financial contributions would make it easier for Syrian refugees to return home. The stick is the threat to allow attacks to proceed on the last major Syrian enclave held by anti-government forces, the northwestern province of Idlib, where 2.3 million people would be at risk. Both tacks are wrong.

Russian and Syrian forces’ indiscriminate bombing and shelling have devastated large swathes of Syrian cities. The estimated reconstruction cost is $250bn. Squeezed by a weak economy, Putin has limited capacity to help. Most recently in his meeting with German Chancellor Angela Merkel, Putin argued that if European leaders want Syrian refugees to return home, they should pay up.

But reconstruction aid is far from enough to allay refugees’ concerns about returning to Syria. To begin with, Syrian military and intelligence forces have already diverted large sums of humanitarian aid to line their pockets and fund their slaughter, so there is every reason to fear they would similarly divert reconstruction assistance. To make matters worse, the government has adopted Law 10 of 2018, which allows it to seize the refugees’ property.

Most importantly, many Syrian refugees, worried that the government views them as political opponents by virtue of their flight, fear for their lives if they return. Tens of thousands of Syrians have already disappeared into government detention centers, where torture and executions are rife. Recently the government has begun publishing death notices of former detainees, without any explanation of how they died or opportunity for their families to bury their loved ones.

Syria’s head of air force intelligence, Jamil Hassan, reportedly said last month that three million Syrians are still wanted and, if they return, will be charged with terrorism. In his view, as an anti-government outlet reported, “a Syria with 10 million trustworthy people obedient to the leadership is better than a Syria with 30 million vandals”. Until Putin convinces the Syrian government to dismantle this deadly machinery of repression – and to bring to justice those who operate it – an infusion of reconstruction aid will not persuade most refugees to return.

Given that unappetising carrot, Putin is also wielding a stick, implicitly threatening residents of Idlib. Until now, Idlib has served as an escape. As other anti-government enclaves fell, Syrian forces gave survivors the choice of being dumped in Idlib or risking detention. Roughly half of Idlib’s population is displaced from elsewhere in Syria.

But now Idlib itself is in jeopardy of indiscriminate and sometimes deliberate attacks on civilians and civilian infrastructure such as hospitals. These war crimes are a major reason why an estimated half a million people have been killed and more than half of Syria’s population displaced. Russia clearly has the leverage to prevent a massacre in Idlib. Its air force has fought alongside Syrian aircraft since 2015 – a key reason why pro-government forces, whose battlefield position had been tenuous, now look likely to prevail.

Long before any talk of providing reconstruction assistance for Syria, which in any event would require lifting separate targeted sanctions, European governments should call out Russia’s complicity in Syria’s war crimes and vigorously press the Kremlin to end these atrocities and stop underwriting Syria’s repression. The fate of 2.3 million Syrians in Idlib – not to mention any real prospect of refugees returning – depends on firmly conveying that message.

The Independent

Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Comments
 
Post a comment
 
Name:
Country:
City:
Email:
Comment:
 
    
    
Related Stories
Mary Dejevsky: Putin’s power play
By now, you will probably know that Russia’s president went on primetime TV to announce a climbdown on reforms to the state pension. He did not say whether – a la Theresa..
Mary Dejevsky: Delivering on his promises
Once upon a time the announcement of a summit meeting between the leaders of two powerful and unpredictable states would have been greeted with relief, even hope. But for..
Alexis Mrachek: A cup of transgressions
With the World Cup underway in Russia, the host country is naturally enjoying a lot of international attention. Conspicuously absent from that coverage, however, are Mosc..
Mary Dejevsky: Yulia’s reappearance leaves many questions answered
Eighty days after being found with her father, collapsed on a bench near a Salisbury shopping centre, Yulia Skripal has made a near-miraculous reappearance. She was filme..
Kim Sengupta: Legacy on the line
With his inauguration for the fourth time as president, Vladimir Putin has been in power in Russia for 18 years. It will be nigh on a quarter of a century by the time thi..
FRONTPAGE
 
GALLERY
 
PANORAMA
 
TIME OUT
 
SPORT
 
 
Advertise | Copyright