Classifieds | Archives | Jobs | About TGT | Contact | Subscribe
Last updated 45 minutes ago
Printer Friendly Version | TGT@Twitter | RSS Feed |
John M. Crisp: No one can gainsay anyone else’s patriotism
October 18, 2017
 Print    Send to Friend

Assuming that you could force a six-and-half-foot-tall, 290-pound, thoroughly muscled man with an aggressive attitude to do something – such as stand up for the national anthem – are you sure that you would want to inject that element of coercion into what should be a respectful, devoted and completely voluntary act?

This week, the National Football League and the team owners will talk about this. They’ve invited a few players to sit in, as well.

At issue is what to do about players who choose to take a knee during the playing of the national anthem or who prefer to stay in the locker room until the game starts. Whatever the league and the owners decide, no one can be sure what will happen.

Last year the owners sent a not-so-subtle message to the players by declining to sign the original kneeler, Colin Kaepernick, a quarterback that many agree is better than other quarterbacks currently employed by NFL teams.

But the message didn’t get through. This season, more players began to choose not to stand during the anthem. Inexplicably, but maybe not surprisingly, President Trump exacerbated the controversy by urging the owners to fire any player who won’t stand up, driving the point home with trademark name-calling.

At first, some owners tried to placate the players. For example, Cowboys owner Jerry Jones knelt arm-in-arm at midfield with his players before the anthem, during which the whole team dutifully stood.

But this hasn’t worked, either. On Oct.8, Jones, a Trump supporter, took a tougher line: “But if there’s anything that is disrespectful to the flag, then we will not play.” The expression is ambiguous, but presumably it means that any player who doesn’t stand up will be sitting down – on the bench. And presumably he – like Kaepernick – will eventually lose his livelihood.

No one has the right to gainsay anyone else’s patriotism, but it’s worth noting that the owners and the league, for all their public devotion to the flag, have an enormous stake in their $10-billion industry. And with President Trump publicly calling for fans to stay away from games if players decline to stand, the NFL and the owners have a significant incentive to somehow force their players to comply.

But what if the players push back? Last Friday Russell Okung, an offensive tackle for the Los Angeles Chargers, wrote an open letter urging his 1,700 fellow players to “collaborate and exercise our agency,” before they receive their “respective marching orders.”

Of course the issues that provoked in some players the current lack of enthusiasm for the national anthem ceremony involve questions of racial injustice and inequality. And while 70 per cent of the NFL players are black, there are still plenty of white players who appreciate the right to free expression and who recognise that the racial issues being raised are legitimate.

Besides, nobody wants to be pushed around. And that probably includes you, the fan.

In fact, the fan’s obligation to show quiet reverence to the flag is identical to the players’. And certainly not every fan dutifully does so. During the anthem, plenty of fans are talking, goofing, taking selfies, buying hotdogs or standing in line at the urinals.

And while the league doesn’t have any incentive to force these fans into line, there’s a certain strain of Americanism that doesn’t hesitate to use outward symbols of patriotism as an index on what’s in a citizen’s heart. Before long we’re looking around us to see who’s standing for the anthem, who’s wearing a flag lapel pin and who’s displaying sufficient reverence during the Pledge of Allegiance. And we’re making judgments about who’s a good American and who isn’t.

Tribune News Service

Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Post a comment
Related Stories
Head and heart
In an era of increasing ideological polarisation, many people are trying – and struggling – to understand the minds of those holding opposing views. We often look to a..
Andrew MacLeod: Aid workers are no saints, they can easily go bad
There has been a lot of talk this week of the vast majority of aid workers being good, and there being a small number of bad ones. The challenge, so the theory goes, is t..
Birjees Hussain: The Year of Anniversaries
This year is the year of anniversaries. Some bring back pleasant memories whereas others awful ones. We’ve had so many wars since the world came into existence. In the..
Aysha Taryam: Barricaded in ideological bunkers
The world has shrunk. The vastness that our ancestors experienced is no longer. We have paved roads, built bridges, rode the waves and flew among the clouds to make sure ..
Gina Barreca: Mysteries of dating: Should I stay or leave?
Guidelines governing dating and romance have become more complex than unsolved problems in mathematics. For example, the “deterministic rendezvous problem,” when discu..
Advertise | Copyright