Classifieds | Archives | Jobs | About TGT | Contact | Subscribe
Last updated 4 hours, 27 minutes ago
Printer Friendly Version | TGT@Twitter | RSS Feed |
Plea challenges Meghalaya CM’s tribal status
August 31, 2013
 Print    Send to Friend

Shillong: The Meghalaya High Court (HC) on Friday asked a petitioner who filed a public interest litigation (PIL) challenging the scheduled tribe (ST) status of Chief Minister Mukul Manda Sangma and the state government to produce copies of the necessary laws and rules.

Hearing the case, a division bench of Acting Chief Justice TNK Singh and Justice SR Sen directed the Meghalaya government and the petitioner, Tennydard M. Marak, to produce the Reservation of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Act and Rules of Meghalaya, and a brochure on Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe published and issued by the central government.

It fixed Sept.6 for the next hearing. Marak had filed the PIL alleging that Sangma, the Congress legislator from Ampati constituency in South West Garo Hills, had fraudulently obtained the Scheduled Tribe certificate.

However, Advocate General KS Kynjing, appearing on behalf of the state government, raised the maintainability of the writ petition in the form of PIL and also contended that the affidavit filed by the petitioner in support of the writ petition was not in the prescribed format.

The division bench thus permitted the advocate general to file a short affidavit on the two issues.

The respondents to the PIL include the state of Meghalaya, represented by the secretary to the department of welfare of scheduled tribes and scheduled castes, secretary to the home department, South West Garo Hills deputy commissioner, West Garo Hills deputy commissioner, and the chief minister himself.

Earlier, Marak had sent a complaint to the National Commission for Scheduled Tribes demanding cancellation of the Scheduled Tribe certificate which was accorded to Sangma. He had also asked the Election Commission to take action against the chief minister.

Not only Marak, the All North East Indigenous Garo Law Promoter Association, had recently alleged that Sangma does not belong to the “Sangma” clan, and that he had used his surname only to obtain a Scheduled Tribe certificate.

In the past, certain groups and individuals had raised the issue because of the fact that the chief minister’s late mother was a non-Garo.

Indo-Asian News Service

Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Post a comment
Related Stories
SP, NCP form ‘Third Front’ for Bihar polls
LUCKNOW: The Samajwadi Party (SP) on Thursday joined hands with the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) and two other outfits and announced the formation of a “Third Front” ..
Parties want PM broadcast banned
NEW DELHI: The anti-Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) grand alliance on Wednesday approached the Election Commission (EC) seeking suspension of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s ..
Congress demands Centre’s apology in stamp row
NEW DELHI: Congress on Wednesday demanded an apology from the Modi government for its decision to discontinue postal stamps issued in memory of former prime ministers Ind..
Centre removes Vadra from ‘no-frisking list’
NEW DELHI: Robert Vadra, the son-in-law of Congress president Sonia Gandhi, will no longer be spared security checks at airports. The government has withdrawn Vadra’s ..
LJP sulks over seat-sharing formula
NEW DELHI: Lok Janshakti Party (LJP), which has been sulking over the seat sharing deal in the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) in Bihar, on Tuesday came out in the ope..
Advertise | Copyright