Classifieds | Archives | Jobs | About TGT | Contact | Subscribe
 | 
Last updated 1 hour, 15 minutes ago
Printer Friendly Version | TGT@Twitter | RSS Feed |
HOME LOCAL MIDEAST ASIA WORLD BUSINESS SPORT OPINION WRITERS
Lawyer owes $300,000 for making fake child porn
November 11, 2012
 Print    Send to Friend

WASHINGTON: An Ohio lawyer who created sexually explicit images of children as part of a legal defence in child pornography trials must pay the children’s parents $300,000, a federal appeals court ruled on Friday.

Dean Boland, the lawyer at the centre of the case, did not respond to requests for comment.

In 2004, Boland was hired as an expert witness by criminal defence lawyers to testify at three separate criminal proceedings for defendants on trial for possessing child pornography.

In an effort to argue that pornography laws were too broad because defendants had no way of knowing whether photos were real or fake, Boland downloaded images of two children from a stock photo website and digitally manipulated them so the minors appeared to be engaged in sexual acts, according to court documents. In one, a child was eating a doughnut, which Boland replaced with a penis. In another, he transposed a child’s face onto the body of a nude woman performing sexual acts with two men.

He then used the before-and-after pictures at trial to demonstrate the difficulty of telling the difference between real and digitally morphed images.

Federal child pornography law bans the possession of images “created, adapted or modified” to show an identifiable minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct. However, it does not ban entirely computer-generated child pornography.

After the Federal Bureau of Investigation learned about Boland’s testimony, federal agents searched Boland’s home and seized his files. To avoid being criminally prosecuted, Boland entered a diversion agreement in which he admitted to creating and possessing child pornography in violation of federal law. He also published an apology in the Cleveland Bar Journal.

Despite his admission, he defended his right to use the images in court, even filing a lawsuit against the federal government, which was ultimately dismissed.

In 2007, the parents of the two children in the original stock photos sued Boland under federal child pornography laws that allow the minor victims of child pornography to recover damages.

A federal judge initially dismissed the lawsuit, finding that the law shielded expert witnesses from liability. But the 6th US Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati last year disagreed, sending the case back to the district judge, who awarded $150,000 to each child.    
Reuters
 

Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Comments
 
Post a comment
 
Name:
Country:
City:
Email:
Comment:
 
    
    
Related Stories
Two killed in Florida shootout
TALLAHASSEE: A Florida official says a sheriff’s deputy and a gunman have been killed in shootout near Tallahassee. The official says the gunman set his house on fire ..
Woman says her father abused her as a child
SALT LAKE CITY: A woman featured in a reality TV show about a polygamous family is going public about sex abuse she claims she suffered as a child in hopes of changing a ..
Ferguson grand jury still undecided
FERGUSON: Nearly a week after Missouri Governor Jay Nixon declared a state of emergency ahead of a decision in the contentious Ferguson police shooting, reports surfaced ..
FBI arrests two Ferguson bomb suspects
FERGUSON: Two men suspected of buying explosives they planned to detonate during protests in Ferguson, Missouri, once a grand jury decides the Michael Brown case, were ar..
Two children die in NJ home shooting
TABERNACLE: Officials on Thursday had more questions than answers in a home shooting in southern New Jersey that left two children dead and their brother and mother in cr..
 
FRONTPAGE
 
GALLERY
 
PANORAMA
 
TIME OUT
 
SPORT
 
 
Advertise | Copyright