Classifieds | Archives | Jobs | About TGT | Contact | Subscribe
Last updated 32 minutes ago
Printer Friendly Version | TGT@Twitter | RSS Feed |
Lawyer owes $300,000 for making fake child porn
November 11, 2012
 Print    Send to Friend

WASHINGTON: An Ohio lawyer who created sexually explicit images of children as part of a legal defence in child pornography trials must pay the children’s parents $300,000, a federal appeals court ruled on Friday.

Dean Boland, the lawyer at the centre of the case, did not respond to requests for comment.

In 2004, Boland was hired as an expert witness by criminal defence lawyers to testify at three separate criminal proceedings for defendants on trial for possessing child pornography.

In an effort to argue that pornography laws were too broad because defendants had no way of knowing whether photos were real or fake, Boland downloaded images of two children from a stock photo website and digitally manipulated them so the minors appeared to be engaged in sexual acts, according to court documents. In one, a child was eating a doughnut, which Boland replaced with a penis. In another, he transposed a child’s face onto the body of a nude woman performing sexual acts with two men.

He then used the before-and-after pictures at trial to demonstrate the difficulty of telling the difference between real and digitally morphed images.

Federal child pornography law bans the possession of images “created, adapted or modified” to show an identifiable minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct. However, it does not ban entirely computer-generated child pornography.

After the Federal Bureau of Investigation learned about Boland’s testimony, federal agents searched Boland’s home and seized his files. To avoid being criminally prosecuted, Boland entered a diversion agreement in which he admitted to creating and possessing child pornography in violation of federal law. He also published an apology in the Cleveland Bar Journal.

Despite his admission, he defended his right to use the images in court, even filing a lawsuit against the federal government, which was ultimately dismissed.

In 2007, the parents of the two children in the original stock photos sued Boland under federal child pornography laws that allow the minor victims of child pornography to recover damages.

A federal judge initially dismissed the lawsuit, finding that the law shielded expert witnesses from liability. But the 6th US Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati last year disagreed, sending the case back to the district judge, who awarded $150,000 to each child.    

Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Post a comment
Related Stories
Colorado gunman was a loner, says media
WASHINGTON: People who knew the suspected gunman in the Colorado Springs shooting described him as a loner who was “weird” but had given few signs of violent behavior, US..
Jesse Jackson calls for resignations over Chicago police shooting
CHICAGO: Civil rights leader Reverend Jesse Jackson on Saturday joined a chorus calling for Chicago’s police superintendent and a top prosecutor to resign for the way the..
8-year-old boy charged in infant girl’s death
BIRMINGHAM: An 8-year-old boy is being charged with beating a 1-year-old girl to death while they were left home alone as their mothers went to a nightclub, Alabama polic..
Texas schedules 24th execution of the year
HUNTSVILLE: Licho Escamilla was slated on Wednesday night to become the 24th convicted killer put to death this year in the United States. The 19-year-old was already ..
Couple charged with beating up son fatally
NEW HARTFORD: A central New York couple has been charged with fatally beating their 19-year-old son inside a church and four fellow church members have been charged with ..
Advertise | Copyright