Classifieds | Archives | Jobs | About TGT | Contact | Subscribe
 | 
Last updated 1 minute ago
Printer Friendly Version | TGT@Twitter | RSS Feed |
HOME LOCAL MIDEAST ASIA WORLD BUSINESS SPORT OPINION WRITERS
Lawyer owes $300,000 for making fake child porn
November 11, 2012
 Print    Send to Friend

WASHINGTON: An Ohio lawyer who created sexually explicit images of children as part of a legal defence in child pornography trials must pay the children’s parents $300,000, a federal appeals court ruled on Friday.

Dean Boland, the lawyer at the centre of the case, did not respond to requests for comment.

In 2004, Boland was hired as an expert witness by criminal defence lawyers to testify at three separate criminal proceedings for defendants on trial for possessing child pornography.

In an effort to argue that pornography laws were too broad because defendants had no way of knowing whether photos were real or fake, Boland downloaded images of two children from a stock photo website and digitally manipulated them so the minors appeared to be engaged in sexual acts, according to court documents. In one, a child was eating a doughnut, which Boland replaced with a penis. In another, he transposed a child’s face onto the body of a nude woman performing sexual acts with two men.

He then used the before-and-after pictures at trial to demonstrate the difficulty of telling the difference between real and digitally morphed images.

Federal child pornography law bans the possession of images “created, adapted or modified” to show an identifiable minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct. However, it does not ban entirely computer-generated child pornography.

After the Federal Bureau of Investigation learned about Boland’s testimony, federal agents searched Boland’s home and seized his files. To avoid being criminally prosecuted, Boland entered a diversion agreement in which he admitted to creating and possessing child pornography in violation of federal law. He also published an apology in the Cleveland Bar Journal.

Despite his admission, he defended his right to use the images in court, even filing a lawsuit against the federal government, which was ultimately dismissed.

In 2007, the parents of the two children in the original stock photos sued Boland under federal child pornography laws that allow the minor victims of child pornography to recover damages.

A federal judge initially dismissed the lawsuit, finding that the law shielded expert witnesses from liability. But the 6th US Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati last year disagreed, sending the case back to the district judge, who awarded $150,000 to each child.    
Reuters
 

Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Comments
 
Post a comment
 
Name:
Country:
City:
Email:
Comment:
 
    
    
Related Stories
Dead prosecutor feared guards: Aide
BUENOS AIRES: The prosecutor whose suspicious death set off a crisis for Argentina President Cristina Kirchner no longer trusted even his bodyguards at the violent end of..
UN to probe Mexico missing students’ case
MEXICO CITY: The UN Committee on Enforced Disappearances will probe Mexico for the first time, as the country grapples with a crisis over 43 students missing and feared d..
US scientist jailed over N-spy sting
WASHINGTON: A naturalised US citizen was jailed on Wednesday for five years for attempting to help Venezuela build a nuclear weapon by passing on secret information, the ..
Jury selection starts in theatre shooting case
CENTENNIAL: As the first day of jury selection ended on Tuesday in the Colorado theater shooting, it was a far different James Holmes at the defense table: The jail unifo..
Cops probe gunshots near Biden’s home
WILMINGTON: Law enforcement officials have boosted security at the Delaware home of Vice President Joe Biden after several gunshots rang out from a vehicle speeding by th..
 
FRONTPAGE
 
GALLERY
 
PANORAMA
 
TIME OUT
 
SPORT
 
 
Advertise | Copyright