Classifieds | Archives | Jobs | About TGT | Contact | Subscribe
Last updated 0 minute ago
Printer Friendly Version | TGT@Twitter | RSS Feed |
Milo Comerford: Iraq’s new power broker could be turning in a new direction
May 28, 2018
 Print    Send to Friend

The seismic change in last week’s election reflects deep structural shifts in Iraqi society. Muqtada Al Sadr’s party won the most MPs, although not a majority and he himself did not stand. But his apparent transformation from a sectarian anti-Western, pro-Iranian cleric to an anti-Iranian, anti-corruption nationalist, is part of a wider picture of change in the country and across the whole region.

As Iraq recovers from a crippling conflict with militant insurgency, and gives fresh thought to its place in the region including re-evaluating its relationship with an increasingly ostracised Iran, the likely formation of a coalition between Al Sadr, the nationalist cleric, and Haider Al Abadi, the incumbent prime minister, might seem incongruous.

But there is considerable alignment in Abadi and Sadr’s priorities. Their alliance will be a critical moment for Iraq, the Middle East and Western policy-making in the region, as the faultline in regional politics shifts away from zero-sum sectarianism and towards a choice between modernisation and extremism.

Sadr’s ascension from a wildcard rebel to a champion of the people has been the main story of these elections. Hailing from a revered clerical family, and an Islamist ideologue of the same persuasion as Iran’s Shia revolutionaries, Sadr garnered international infamy for his command of the sectarian Mahdi Army militia. But, accompanying the reboot of his private army as the anti-Daesh “peace companies”, Sadr has undergone a political transformation — especially in his thinking about Iraq’s alliances, culminating in high-profile meetings with the Saudi leadership.

The cleric’s transformation is itself indicative of a wider shift in the Iraqi electorate, away from ideological and identity-based voting towards pragmatism and a desire for effective governance. Opinion polling by the Centre for Strategic and International Studies suggests that voters are increasingly leaving behind religious sectarian identifications and sub-identities, shifting instead towards a nationalism that seeks to cast off the shackles of outside influences and international interests.

The Daesh insurgency that ravaged northern and western Iraq for three and a half years seems to have had the effect of bringing the embattled country together, rather than, as many expected, driving further sectarian division. But despite Iraq’s eventual success in tackling the scourge of Daesh militancy, the new leadership must not rest on its laurels. Unless the underlying drivers of Salafi-jihadi militancy are addressed – sectarian grievance, the politicisation of religion, and poor governance — the country risks the re-emergence of the threat.

Despite optimistic signs from the election, big challenges face the next administration. A priority for the new government will be tackling corruption and rebuilding Iraq’s economy. These campaign pledges, and an “Iraq first” message, meant Sadr was able to reach out beyond sectarian divides — with polling finding his biggest areas of support were in mixed communities.

Equally, Sadr’s about-face on Iran’s role in Iraq is of considerable significance, commonly ascribed to his realisation that Tehran had a destabilising influence in the country. According to his political ally Dhiaa al-Asadi, Sadr visited Saudi Arabia last summer “to tell them that the Shiites of Iraq are not going to be an extension of the Iranian revolution — his visit was to ask them to be more present in Iraq.”

Sadr’s recent meeting with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman is part of a wider realignment across the Middle East, away from competing sectarian interests, and towards a faultline of modernisers and secular reformists on the one hand, and those fomenting sectarian division and extremist violence on the other.

The Independent

Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Post a comment
Related Stories
Michael Jansen: Dire hardship governs Iraq
Iraqi Shias now say life was better under Saddam Hussein than the sectarian regime imposed by the US occupation in 2003. Furthermore, they have made this assessment for t..
Michael Jansen: Tackling the challenges ahead
The US and Iran have to live and work with Iraq’s new government although Washington is in the process of imposing punitive economic sanctions against Tehran with the aim..
Michael Jansen: Basra should be booming
The US post-2003 order has been under challenge in Iraq from a new quarter: Shias who expected to benefit from Washington’s installation of a Shia fundamentalist regime i..
Trudy Rubin: A shameful saga of US callousness toward Iraqis
A year ago I wrote a column titled “From Iraq, a good-news immigration story.” It concerned the reversal of a cruel injustice the US bureaucracy had perpetrated on the..
Salam Faraj: Wages of war
Karrar Hassan, 25, is just one of tens of thousands of Iraqi fighters wounded battling Daesh. Now disabled, he struggles to survive on a $400 pension. In 2014, he was ..
Advertise | Copyright