Classifieds | Archives | Jobs | About TGT | Contact | Subscribe
 | 
Last updated 37 minutes ago
Printer Friendly Version | TGT@Twitter | RSS Feed |
HOME LOCAL MIDEAST ASIA WORLD BUSINESS SPORT OPINION WRITERS
Lawrence J. McQuillan: If health-care reform falters, insurers may pay a high price
October 06, 2013
 Print    Send to Friend

America’s health insurance companies sold out for higher profits when they fought for the Affordable Care Act rather than a patient-driven system that would best serve the sick. Big insurers were omnipresent during the health-care negotiations. Their most effective negotiator was Karen Ignagni, CEO of America’s Health Insurance Plans, the industry’s leading lobby. Washingtonian magazine called her one of the top three “Top Guns” of all trade association heads, and she proved it. In March 2009, Ignagni promised President Barack Obama: “You have our commitment to play, to contribute, and to help pass health-care reform this year.” And play she did.

Ignagni and AHIP members participated in hundreds of meetings and spent millions of dollars to shape the final bill. They received a lot for their time and money. The Affordable Care Act requires almost every American to buy health insurance or pay a penalty. Nothing was more important to insurers than securing the individual mandate. Just as corn farmers support ethanol subsidies, health insurers support insurance subsidies. Private insurers stand to gain at least 18 million new customers through 2022 due to the health-care law, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Not everything in the act helps insurers, but they were savvy enough to make sure the net effect of the law helped their bottom line. Stock prices reveal the positive effect on the long-term profitability of the largest health insurance companies.

For example, during the two years after President Obama signed the health-care bill into law in March 2010, Aetna’s share price increased 33 per cent, UnitedHealth gained 65 per cent, all outperforming the 14 per cent rise in the Standard and Poor’s 500 Index during the period. Health insurance stocks outperformed the market during the run up to the bill’s signing too.

It pays to be one of the few sellers of a product the government is going to force everyone to buy and provides subsidies to help them do it. Insurers were so pleased with the final bill that a month after Obama signed it, Ignagni said her organisation was “strongly committed” to its “successful implementation.” In that cause, AHIP became the act’s marketing partner.

AHIP provided seed money to “Enroll America,” a 50-state implementation effort led by Ron Pollack of Families USA. “We are participating in it,” said AHIP spokesman Robert Zirkelbach. “The goal is to get everyone covered.”

Actually, the primary goal is to force coverage on the young, healthy and subsidised – because that will boost the insurers’ profits the most. Americans should understand that none of this was written in stone.

Health insurance companies could have fought the healthcare legislation, but chose instead to sell out the public for the government dole and massive subsidies. Americans would be better served by a patient-driven system of privately purchased, affordable and portable health insurance with health savings accounts and payment assistance for the poor. Tax breaks would go to individuals, not employers. This would put more buying power in the hands of patients seeking the best health care at the lowest price.

MCT
 

Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Comments
 
Post a comment
 
Name:
Country:
City:
Email:
Comment:
 
    
    
 
FRONTPAGE
 
GALLERY
 
PANORAMA
 
TIME OUT
 
SPORT
 
 
Advertise | Copyright