Classifieds | Archives | Jobs | About TGT | Contact | Subscribe
Last updated 0 minute ago
Printer Friendly Version | TGT@Twitter | RSS Feed |
Emlyn Pearce: A double-edged sword
December 16, 2017
 Print    Send to Friend

The former Facebook executive Chamath Palihapitiya has claimed that social media is “destroying how society works”. For two years, I have had a blog on Facebook that celebrates difference and encourages the building of community, and Palihapitiya’s characterisation of social media is not one I recognise.

So ubiquitous and influential has social media become that it is easy to forget that we are still in the early dawn of its age. When cars were as old as social media is now, there were no seatbelts, no airbags, no driving tests, and no breathalysers. Safety measures and design features that we take for granted were totally unimaginable.

The first pedestrian to be killed by a car in the UK, Bridget Driscoll, was killed by a car travelling at four miles per hour. Witnesses said she had frozen in front of the vehicle and seemed “bewildered”.

In 2017, we are no longer bewildered by cars travelling at four miles an hour. We have adapted to what was once new technology, and the road death rate in the UK continues to fall year after year, even as the number of cars on our roads continues to rise. Road deaths in 2016 were 1792 – less than a fifth of what they were in 1941, when deaths peaked at 9,169.

All new technologies are subject to cynicism. When umbrellas first arrived in the UK, users reported being abused and called “Frenchmen” in the street. But just as we got used to umbrellas and cars, there are now millions of people who are starting to develop ways to make social media the safe, empowering, life-enhancing tool that they believe it can be.

I have had the privilege of meeting some of these people through my blog. People like Maz Saleem, whose father Mohammed was murdered in a terrorist attack in Birmingham in 2013.

Maz founded a page on Facebook called “Education for Peace in Remembrance of Mohammed Saleem RIP” which fights against Islamophobia and stands up for the rights of refugees. The page now has more than 18,000 followers.

Before social media, Maz Saleem would have had to appeal to a powerful person – probably white, probably male, probably not a Muslim – to get permission to be heard. In the social media age, the power is all hers.

I have written about Martyn Hett, who used social media to create funny videos about Coronation Street, to promote his mum’s craft fair and to entertain millions of people. When Martyn was killed in the Manchester Arena bombing, my post encouraging people to #BeMoreMartyn went viral and encouraged thousands of people to be braver, to leave abusive relationships, to change jobs, or, in the case of one woman, to post a photograph of her beautiful disabled son, when previously she had been too afraid to do so.

Martyn Hett used social media to make the world a better place, and through social media he has continued to make people’s lives better even after death.

People like Maz and Martyn appreciate that what social media lacks in factual accuracy, it makes up for in its ability to build relationships. Social media is a tool, and like all tools, whether its effects are good or bad lies entirely in how it is used.

To claim that social media is destroying society is like claiming that bricks are the cause of Trump’s border wall or that turkeys and crackers are the reason we have family arguments at Christmas. Social media is a way of managing our relationships, but it is not responsible for the quality of those relationships. We are.

By improving our skills of communication, by making social media a place to contribute, to organise, and to pull together, it may yet be the most glorious invention we have ever created. We hold the keys, the compasses, the maps, and the directions. Where we end up is entirely in our hands.

The Independent

Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Post a comment
Related Stories
Ben Chu: The price of online data
On my morning commute last week I decided to dip into a bit of 18th-century philosophy: Hume’s fork, Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. Then I veered off into some physics: ..
David L. Ulin: Why is it so hard to let house phones go?
Recently, in a decision that felt by turns overdue and impulsive, I gave up my landline. That I had resisted would come as no surprise to those who know me; I have long h..
Mateja Kovacic: Life in the fast lane
Before I started working on real-world robots, I wrote about their fictional and historical ancestors. This isn’t so far removed from what I do now. In factories, labs, a..
Betty Chang: AI is essential for our future health
Artificial intelligence may still be in its infancy, but its moving fast. Nowhere is this more apparent than in the data-rich health sector. AI has the potential to provi..
Ashley Nunes: Driverless cars need more testing time
Britain’s efforts to roll out self-driving technology continue. London’s Gatwick Airport recently announced plans to deploy autonomous vehicles on the airfield. The goal?..
Advertise | Copyright