Classifieds | Archives | Jobs | About TGT | Contact | Subscribe
Last updated 30 minutes ago
Printer Friendly Version | TGT@Twitter | RSS Feed |
John M. Crisp: A legacy of bad choices in the Middle East
December 13, 2017
 Print    Send to Friend

The world’s worst dilemmas are characterised by a lack of good options. Indeed, that’s the definition of a dilemma. But bad options are often the result of bad choices.

This is the case in the Middle East. In “The Prize,” his massive Pulitzer-Prize-winning history of oil, Daniel Yergin suggests that the first bad choice for that most intractable of trouble spots occurred in 1911. Winston Churchill, Britain’s First Lord of the Admiralty, concluded that war with Germany had become inevitable, and he decided to convert his nation’s warships to oil power.

Previously, British ships had been propelled by domestic coal, but Churchill recognized the superior power and efficiency of oil. Oil-driven ships could go farther at higher speeds and with less manpower. Critics pointed out that Britain would no longer be able to depend on secure coal from Wales. Instead it would be required to acquire oil from exotic locations such as Persia, as Iran was known at the time.

In retrospect, it’s fairer to Churchill to call his choice “inevitable” rather than “bad.” World Wars I and II were won with oil power, and in the case of WWII particularly, victory was essential. Clearly, the wars couldn’t have been won — or even been possible on their enormous scale — without oil.

Other choices, however, were less inevitable. Around the same time Churchill was choosing oil over coal, the United States was choosing oil over electricity to power personal motor vehicles instead of public transportation, a choice that greatly influenced the shape the modern world.

The vast oil reserves in the Middle East elevated the West’s interest in that region, as well as the status of countries whose natural resources had previously been severely limited. This led to more bad choices.

For example, democracy was off to a good start in Iran after the revolution of 1905, which began after the shah’s son sold to Britain a generous 60-year concession for the rights to Iranian oil. Unfortunately, the British, preferring a compliant monarchy to a parliament with a mind of its own, staged a coup in 1921 and put the governing power into the hands of a dictatorial shah.

By the early 50’s, the Iranian parliament had reasserted its power against a new shah, a weak leader with the personality of a playboy. Iran’s democratic and nationalistic aspirations were embodied in the prime minister, Mohammad Mossadegh, who became an international spokesman for anti-colonialism.

Unfortunately, the United States sponsored a coup in 1953 that deposed Mossadegh and empowered the Shah of Iran, whose dictatorial rule and lavish lifestyle led to the 1979 revolution that put into power the current theocracy.

Other bad choices ensued, from the terrible decision to invade Iraq in 2003 to President Trump’s decision last week to recognise Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, while asking for nothing in return. We appear to be on the verge of another bad choice: taking the wrong side in the regional rivalry between Iran and Saudi Arabia.

For a century we’ve flooded the Middle East with petrodollars. Instead, a better choice might be to export the soft power of better ideas: more tolerance for non-Muslims and improved status for women.

Saudi Arabia and Iran could both benefit from these enlightened principles, and we could benefit from their reinforcement in our own country.

Tribune News Service

Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Post a comment
Related Stories
Michael Jansen: Misdirected efforts
Having taken a leave of absence since departing the White House, former President Barack Obama has re-emerged on the US political scene to campaign for the 2020 president..
Michael Jansen: Oslo Accord, a rank failure
Signed 25 years ago with considerable ceremony on the White House lawn, the Oslo Accord was almost designed to fail to achieve an end to the Israeli occupation of Palesti..
Michael Jansen: A vicious, vindictive act
Donald Trump’s decision to defund the UN agency that provides for Palestinian refugees is vicious and vindictive. The decision is vicious because UNRWA provides food, hea..
Michael Jansen: Adding to Palestinian woes
The Trump administration’s regional policy is based on business-style deal-making that could undermine the stability of this region... The first involves cultivating and ..
Michael Jansen: Leslie Cockburn’s brave crusade
Democratic party candidate for a Virginia Congressional seat Leslie Cockburn is being branded as an anti-Semite by the Republican incumbent who has resigned his post beca..
Advertise | Copyright