Classifieds | Archives | Jobs | About TGT | Contact | Subscribe
Last updated 3 hours, 44 minutes ago
Printer Friendly Version | TGT@Twitter | RSS Feed |
Arnav Joshi: The online dangerous web of ‘I accept’
November 21, 2017
 Print    Send to Friend

The biggest fallacy in many people’s understanding of online data gathering is the widely-held belief that the only real downside to what they willingly offer up online is them seeing a few more harmless ads. Nothing, sadly, could be further from the truth.

While ad-targeting is both prominent and increasingly invasive, ads are but the tip of the iceberg, and an ominous mass of other destinations for our data lies beneath the surface. Here is some of what else happens after you scroll down those ostensibly impossible-to-read terms and conditions and hit “I accept”.

Data brokers

These are people who trawl the Internet collecting, buying and selling people’s online data, usually to anyone who’s willing to buy. While they are not new actors in the data industry, most discussions about them centre around the sale of data to potential advertisers. There is, however, a far darker side to what data can be obtained and the damage it can do.

In Europe, legally perhaps the most secure jurisdiction for data rights, a recent investigation made shocking revelations about the kind of data one could buy off the Internet from such brokers. This included financial records, clean or murky browsing history, locations visited and even drug preferences.

In India, this is exacerbated by biometric Aadhaar information with insufficient safeguards, brazenly collected and connected with every service and utility the government’s dart lands on. This then begs the question: In the wrong hands, which could be competitors, governments, or unscrupulous elements on the dark web, what is the kind of damage that this data can cause?


Algorithms that utilise machine learning and big data analytics to support decisions are becoming increasingly ubiquitous. Using myriad structured and unstructured data crunched through what are known colloquially as black boxes, they produce actionable scores and ranks (1 to 5, red, yellow and green), effectively telling the user exactly what decision to make.

These gimmicks and filter bubbles are based on processes that constantly learn, adapt and perfect themselves based on a constant stream of training data from us, their users. On Facebook, among a plethora of other data points, every click, hover, picture and poke is stored and analysed. Uber uses location information even after you’ve left your cab (although they’ve vowed to roll this back), Amazon and Google use voice data shared with Google Now and Alexa.

All this data enables companies to refine their products and tailor user-experience with incredible precision, to know you better than you know yourself. While, arguably, there’s nothing wrong (or illegal) in the fact that this is done, users are largely blind to their contributions in bettering these products, and in turn adding to someone’s bottomline.

As we inch towards this, there is plenty people can do by proactively educating themselves and making informed decisions about their data. The oft-repeated adage of social media economics is that on the Internet, if you’re not paying for something, you are the product, not the customer. And that’s probably okay for most of us, resigned as we increasingly are to our datafied fates.

We can, however, no longer ignore the caveat emptor slapped on every digital product we use, and the time to wake up and smell the megabytes is here, and now.

Indo-Asian News Service

Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Post a comment
Related Stories
Ben Chu: Does Tesla fare better than scribes on autopilot?
Are journalists innumerate? Elon Musk and Steven Pinker think so. A range of news outlets reported earlier this month that one of Musk’s Tesla cars, in “autopilot” mode, ..
Viorica Marian: Magic of advanced technology
More than 25 million. That’s how many people saw my joke on Twitter. “I once taught an 8am college class. So many grandparents died that semester. I then moved my clas..
Ben Chu: The price of online data
On my morning commute last week I decided to dip into a bit of 18th-century philosophy: Hume’s fork, Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. Then I veered off into some physics: ..
David L. Ulin: Why is it so hard to let house phones go?
Recently, in a decision that felt by turns overdue and impulsive, I gave up my landline. That I had resisted would come as no surprise to those who know me; I have long h..
Mateja Kovacic: Life in the fast lane
Before I started working on real-world robots, I wrote about their fictional and historical ancestors. This isn’t so far removed from what I do now. In factories, labs, a..
Advertise | Copyright