Classifieds | Archives | Jobs | About TGT | Contact | Subscribe
 | 
Last updated 3 hours, 20 minutes ago
Printer Friendly Version | TGT@Twitter | RSS Feed |
HOME LOCAL MIDEAST ASIA WORLD BUSINESS SPORT OPINION WRITERS
Christine Flowers: Travel ban is a Muslim ban, any way you slice it
March 20, 2017
 Print    Send to Friend

Religion is very important to me. I’m not unusual. According to a recent Pew report, three-quarters of Americans said that religion was at least “somewhat important” in their lives, and well over half said that it was “very important.” Only 11 percent said that it was “not important.”

We are privileged to live in a country where our respective faiths are generally protected and respected. Of course, there are the random acts of bigotry, like overturned gravestones, the heckling of men and women in religious garb and the destruction of religious icons. Sometimes Muslims live in fear, sometimes Jews and sometimes Christians are the ones picking up the shattered glass from their vandalised churches.

But for the most part, we do not cower in basements to read the New Testament, the Torah or the Quran. While religion might only be “somewhat important,” the right to believe or disbelieve without any sanction or explanation is the single most important incident of our collective citizenship.

That is why I was smiling on Wednesday evening and again on Thursday morning when I learned President Trump’s second “travel ban” was blocked by courts in Hawaii and Maryland.

Because, and you have to listen to me closely without putting on the cartoonish “anti-” and “pro-” immigration uniforms, this travel ban was not aimed at travel. It was aimed at religion.

Most of those who support Trump’s attempts to limit the issuance of visas to citizens of certain countries truly believe there is a nexus between the nationality of those citizens and the bombs that explode in marketplaces and churches, outside synagogues and at airports. More important, they believe that it is not only the passports of those citizens that predict the propensity toward terror, but their professed faith.

I know our president believed that, at least judging from what he said on the campaign trail, when he was “calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States.” To be fair, he added that the shutdown would only be temporary, until “our country’s representatives can figure out what is going on.” Of course, given the agility of our politicians and the speed with which they act, that means we’ll be waiting until the 12th day in the month of Never.

When the administration tried to present its first, ill-fated immigration initiative as just a travel ban, most of us who remembered his comments about Muslims said “that’s not what you said the first time, Mr President.” We also recalled the pithy observations of one of Trump’s policy gurus, Stephen Miller, who was instrumental in crafting the original, ill-fated ban and who has a history of attacking “Islamofascism.” Miller confirmed in a Fox News interview that the second ban was basically the first one wrapped up in prettier paper. In fact, he said, “Fundamentally, you’re still going to have the same basic policy outcome for the country.”

That policy outcome was to make sure that immigrants from majority-Muslim countries would not be able to come into the country, in some cases for 90 days, in some cases for much longer, in some cases permanently.

Another reason the travel ban is actually a Muslim ban is because it conveniently forgot to put Venezuela on the list, the native country of Carlos the Jackal, a most prolific terrorist, or Colombia, or Ireland, or Croatia, or Cuba, or many other countries with a non-Muslim majority population that have been the source of much of the world’s terrorist acts over the past 40 years.

Tribune News Service

Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Comments
 
Post a comment
 
Name:
Country:
City:
Email:
Comment:
 
    
    
Related Stories
Mythili Sampathkumar: Silence on racism is not an option
I’ve largely stayed away from expressing my personal thoughts on the violence that erupted over the weekend in Charlottesville, mostly because I was reporting on it as th..
Dan McLaughlin: Intent shouldn’t define hate crimes
According to the most recent public reports, hate crimes increased in California in 2015 by more than 10 per cent, faster than the national average. Hate crimes involving..
Michael Hiltzik: United — A botched job
The adage about a picture being worth a thousand words never seemed as true as it did Monday when a video clip shot around the Internet showing a passenger being violentl..
Mohammed Fairouz: A basic racial intolerance
“I am pleading,” said Hillary Clinton a few days ago, “that our government will continue its leadership role on behalf of peace in the world, because the world must conti..
Eddie Chambers: Is Black History Month still important?
While some have decried Black History Month as taking place during the shortest month of the year, the celebration has in fact come a long way since its creator, historia..
FRONTPAGE
 
GALLERY
 
PANORAMA
 
TIME OUT
 
SPORT
 
 
Advertise | Copyright