Classifieds | Archives | Jobs | About TGT | Contact | Subscribe
 | 
Last updated 1 hour, 54 minutes ago
Printer Friendly Version | TGT@Twitter | RSS Feed |
HOME LOCAL MIDEAST ASIA WORLD BUSINESS SPORT OPINION WRITERS
US acts on commitments, says Obama
May 09, 2013
 Print    Send to Friend

WASHINGTON: President Barack Obama is remembering Iraq.

And the world, he says, will remember what the US did about Osama Bin Laden and Muammar Qadhafi.

All of this has to do with the “red line” — the use of chemical weapons in Syria which Obama has said the US will not tolerate. And what the world is to make of the time Obama is taking assessing evidence that Syria has crossed it.

“In the end, whether it’s Bin Laden or Qadhafi,” Obama said, “if we say we’re taking a position, I think at this point the international community has a pretty good idea that we act on our commitments.”

At a joint White House news conference with President Park Geun-Hye of South Korea on Wednesday, Obama was asked at what point the costs of doing something are outweighed by the costs of doing nothing.

“I think there’d be severe costs in doing nothing,” Obama replied. “That’s why we’re not doing nothing.”

The US is providing nonlethal aid to the opposition.

“If what you’re asking is, are there continuing re-evaluations about what we do, what actions we take in conjunction with other international partners to optimise the day when, or to hasten the day when we can see a better situation in Syria, we’ve been doing that all along and we’ll continue to do that,” he said. “Understandably, there’s a desire for easy answers.”

Intercepting a question posed to his Korean counterpart — asked if the US failing to act on perceived violations of the red line in Syria “could embolden” US enemies elsewhere, such as North Korea — Obama said:

“The operative word there, I guess, is perceived. And what I’ve said is we have evidence that there has been the use of chemical weapons inside of Syria, but I don’t make decisions based on perceived. And I can’t organise international coalitions around “perceived. We tried that in the past, by the way, and it didn’t work out well.”

That would be Iraq, where the US went to war over weapons of mass destruction never found.

Yet the world should take notice of what his administration has done when he has declared that a leader must go, as he did in Libya, and as he has done in Syria, and what he did after a decade-long search for Bin Laden.

Agencies
 

Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Comments
 
Post a comment
 
Name:
Country:
City:
Email:
Comment:
 
    
    
Related Stories
US hails Dutch participation in Iraq raids
WASHINGTON: The White House on Friday welcomed Dutch participation in air strikes on the ISIS group in Iraq, with F-16 fighters from the Netherlands poised to join the ac..
US slams Israel on new colony plan
WASHINGTON: In a striking public rebuke, the Obama administration warned Israel on Wednesday that plans for a controversial new housing project in Arab East Jerusalem wou..
Pentagon short on intelligence as raids go on
WASHINGTON: The Pentagon is grappling with significant intelligence gaps as it bombs Iraq and Syria, and it is operating under less restrictive targeting rules than those..
Iran has role in fighting ISIS: Kerry
WASHINGTON: Washington’s arch-foe Iran has a role to play in tackling Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) militants who have overrun large swathes of territory in Iraq..
Biden says US backs federal system in Iraq
WASHINGTON: Vice President Joe Biden said Friday the United States would back a federal system in Iraq, as he pressed for unity in the sharply divided country amid a grow..
 
FRONTPAGE
 
GALLERY
 
PANORAMA
 
TIME OUT
 
SPORT
 
 
Advertise | Copyright