Angela Rayner is facing an angry backlash against her controversial planning reforms which will force councils to surrender swathes of the green belt and are set to see housebuilding surge by more than 60 per cent. The deputy prime minister has been accused of planning to “bulldoze” the countryside and waging a “war on rural England” as Labour scrambles to meet its pledge to build 1.5 million new homes. Councils have already protested that the target is impossible to achieve, while the National Trust has warned the government’s push to build nearly 400,000 homes a year risks harming “some of the most valuable ‘green’ land to local communities”.
The conservation charity said Labour’s idea of the ‘grey belt’, what it sees as low quality green belt areas, was too broad. Under the plans, which have led to claims they would greenlight housebuilding in an area larger than Surrey, councils will have to review their green belt boundaries. And they will have to use “grey belt” land to meet ambitious mandatory targets to build hundreds of thousands of new homes a year. Compared to recent levels, that would see housebuilding in England increase by more than 60 per cent, from 229,942 to 370,000.
Sir Keir Starmer said ministers would “push through” the building if councils did not. He told Sky News: “The starting point is local plans, and that’s really important for councils to develop the plan according to the target, taking into account local need and working with developers. But are we going to push it through if those plans don’t work? Yes we absolutely are.” He also insisted that building more homes was more important than the environment. “Of course we want to get the balance right with nature and the environment, but if it comes to a human being wanting to have a house for them and their family, that has to be the top priority,” he said. But the environmentalist Chris Packham, writing for The Independent, warned that while the current housing crisis had to be fixed “destroying the ecosystems that we need to survive isn’t bold. At best it is shortsighted - at worst, it’s plain suicidal”
Kevin Hollinrake, the shadow housing secretary, said the move to build 370,000 new homes a year would “bulldoze through the concerns of local communities” and was a “war on rural England”. “If Labour really want homes to be built where they are needed, they must think again,” he said. He also accused ministers of gerrymandering by targeting the green belt, when Labour’s voters traditionally live in more urban areas. “What we’re seeing is typical socialism here, in terms of gerrymandering the house building out of urban areas and building in green belt and rural areas. That can’t be right,” he said. Ms Rayner has defended her plans, saying the government would not shy away from taking “bold and decisive action” to fix the country’s housing crisis. “We must all do our bit and we must all do more. We expect every local area to adopt a plan to meet their housing need. The question is where the homes and local services people expect are built, not whether they are built at all,” she said. Sir Keir pledged to back builders not “blockers”, saying: “We owe it to those working families to take urgent action, and that is what this government is doing.” But Liberal Democrat housing spokesperson Gideon Amos accused ministers of planning to ignore local communities.
“The new homes we need must be genuinely affordable and community led, not dictated from Whitehall diktat,” he said. But Andrew Carter, chief executive of Centre for Cities, said: “Green belt reform needs to go much further than the grey belt rules to enable housebuilding in commuter corridors around big cities.” Beccy Speight, the chief executive of the RSPB, said: “Every new study, every piece of scientific research shows UK nature is in freefall... The government’s wider reforms to the planning system over the coming months must seize the opportunity to restore nature and deliver the thriving, wildlife-rich homes and communities we all deserve.